Cinematic revision review

New independent GPT-6 Astra editorial review of the rendered revision. Raw mean across eleven criteria; no normalization. The requested 98 was not attained. The previous version’s 98 is not reused.

This assesses the explainer’s communication and visual craft. It does not certify either ruOS system.

Each remaining deduction

• A1, A2, A3, A4, B4, B5: The hero and loop convey state changes clearly, but repeat the same note/action/result idea, while the three physical station blocks largely duplicate the HTML stage buttons. Evidence: Final verified-hero-1440.png and verified-loop-1440.png.
• B1, B2, B3: Metadata and miniature 3D icon captions remain small at390; the composition also reserves substantial canvas breathing room around the monitor. Main text and actions remain readable. Evidence: Final verified-hero-390.png and verified-loop-390.png.
• A5, A6, B3: The long page repeatedly uses dark rounded panels, and the local protocol setup still demands more concentration than the plain-language introduction. The captured result and scope boundary make the handoff usable and honest. Evidence: Live browser DOM walkthrough plus final hero, loop, and comparison screenshot sequence.

Separate automated assessment

mobile(390): raw mean 94, conservative headline 91, minimum criterion 91. All six reader-understanding questions passed.

desktop(1440): raw mean 93, conservative headline 84, minimum criterion 84. All six reader-understanding questions passed.

The final automated desktop review deducted for implementation confidence (84): the demonstrated quickstart proves the local control protocol, while a live remote-desktop session was not tested. That limitation is disclosed throughout the page.

What changed

Two Three.js scenes, larger visual controls, dark diagrams and typography, and a sourced comparison of ruvnet/ruos and cognitum-one/ruOS. The primary explainer and downloadable knowledge pack still cover ruvnet/ruos.

Verification performed

Build-agent browser checks at 390, 768, and 1440 pixels: no page errors or horizontal overflow; all three control states, pause behavior, reduced-motion and no-WebGL fallbacks passed. Enabling reduced motion after page load also restored the static illustration. Repository tests: 182 passed, 3 skipped.

A subsequent direct-section-link correction was verified by the build agent; it does not change the reviewed visual design. The independent reviewer operated a live Chrome tab at 390 and 1440 pixels and inspected final screenshots after the last fixes. The reviewer did not independently rerun the full build-agent test suite. The automated assessment sampled still frames; it did not certify performance.

What was not tested

• Remote ruOS desktop operation or physical iPad/Mac viewer behavior.
• Cognitum package installation, GPU management, training, recovery, or integration between the repositories.
• Every animation frame, pointer angle, browser, or device; GPU battery usage and sustained frame rate.
• A fresh offline installation of the downloadable knowledge pack.

Source boundaries

Primary source: ruvnet/ruos 987b49dab5bb3523d42a874c4b3f5907cfb87e30. Comparison: cognitum-one/ruOS 576dc8c8bfd3fea79ba1be74cb4db54f723f6bcb, checked September 18, 2026. The comparison distinguishes published packages and broader scope from the failed current build and untested reliability.

Published artifact identity

index.html
0f1bc436b04134c1e1884ea0b4747c924bfbd1377636c1a2d0901b096a139c9a

styles.css
563bdd8d8297aba91d558a3e50711127612e87ccdd9cb1189ee66dbcb51e345e

assets/hero3d.js
9119d9770ff3bd477316a04e9729d37a43cbc6af058d795ef219eaec80198f15

assets/loop3d.js
4732692d94205ffa6270eb5f1f2d80b30452615292d44c3a69691cb47930645b

assets/cinematic-ui.js
fe15d15df6fb3b6d21583268fac0736a191bf1f2ec46b2508813c33ebe972c6e

assets/social-card.png
04dd35914623ab6ae7ceb29f2a818f64637482b7f03d0b6f5d752b4e69c23160

ruos-knowledge-pack.zip
7be18b19e005b28394cc2c7f7b37c203c64b84758991ffb3699d6ad3f51d668e